<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lodi Amateur Vintners Assoc. Annual Blind Tasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heritageoakwinery.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/lodi-amateur-vintners-assoc-annual-blind-tasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heritageoakwinery.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/lodi-amateur-vintners-assoc-annual-blind-tasting/</link>
	<description>Life at Heritage Oak Winery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:38:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://heritageoakwinery.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/lodi-amateur-vintners-assoc-annual-blind-tasting/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heritageoakwinery.wordpress.com/?p=148#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jim.  I think you are probably right, just as the Seghesio probably still needed several years to go before it reached its prime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jim.  I think you are probably right, just as the Seghesio probably still needed several years to go before it reached its prime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Caudill</title>
		<link>http://heritageoakwinery.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/lodi-amateur-vintners-assoc-annual-blind-tasting/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Caudill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heritageoakwinery.wordpress.com/?p=148#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Vintage selection in a group like this influences results too.  The value wines are mostly on 2006 vintages now and while 2004 is not dramatically older, most people would experience these wines a bit younger.  Interesting exercise and more predictable with Zinfandel than with other varities I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vintage selection in a group like this influences results too.  The value wines are mostly on 2006 vintages now and while 2004 is not dramatically older, most people would experience these wines a bit younger.  Interesting exercise and more predictable with Zinfandel than with other varities I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
